Dynamic Vision Test

GUIDE 07 / 07

Does Dynamic Vision Training Work — What Research Shows About Its Potential and Limits

A study reporting improved batting stats after vision training, and another finding no KVA improvement after 8 weeks of training. Here's what you can expect and what to watch for.

"Training to improve dynamic vision" is popular in sports. Research shows both promise and limits. The key point is that a rising test score and actual performance improving aren't the same thing.

Positive reports

Clark et al. (2012) applied vision training to the University of Cincinnati baseball team for 6 weeks before the season, and reported that team batting average rose from 0.251 the previous year to 0.285, with slugging percentage up 0.033. However, since this wasn't a randomized controlled experiment but a comparison with the previous season, it's hard to rule out the effects of roster changes or other training.

There are also reports, as in the martial arts study (Muiños and Ballesteros, 2015), that people who consistently do exercise requiring long tracking of moving targets have good dynamic vision and less decline even in old age — a result linked more to long-term actual exercise than short training.

Reports of no effect

A review summarizing Japanese KVA research notes that college baseball players given 8 weeks of visual training — either with professional coaching or commercial software — showed no improvement in KVA, and a follow-up study on middle schoolers had similar results (Sawaki et al., 2022).

Why do the results differ?

Things worth trying

Things to be careful about

Try the Test →